Mismatch of envelope and temporal fine structure information destroys the precedence effect Bernhard U. Seeber MRC Institute of Hearing Research, Nottingham, UK The precedence effect (PE) describes our ability to suppress detrimental effects of reflections on localization of sound sources in rooms. For short delays between a direct sound (lead) and its reflection (lag) only one sound is heard and localized at the location of the lead. The information used by the auditory system to obtain the PE is still under debate. Models based on cross-correlation analysis rely on binaural cues extracted from the temporal fine structure (TFS) at low frequencies while envelope information is used to start a lateral inhibition process (e.g. Lindemann, 1986). Another modeling approach bases the PE entirely on envelope or repeated onset information (Zurek, 1987). The fact that some of our patients with bilateral cochlear implants (CIs) showed the PE for ongoing sounds suggests that envelope information can be sufficient (c.f. CIAP 2007); however, since most of our patients localized one sound in-between lead and lag, rather than at the lead, envelope information seems not to be sufficient in most cases. It can be expected that a perfect representation of TFS information will not be possible with CIs in the near future, making the study of the mechanisms and the limits of the PE - and with it the ability to function in multi-source environments - a high priority. The contribution of TFS and envelope information to the PE was studied for noises of 300 ms duration. The envelopes of lead and lag were sinusoidally amplitude modulated (AM) and the modulation phase (delay) between lead and lag was varied across conditions. Subjects adjusted the delay of the TFS in the lag to find the echo threshold while the envelope delay was kept constant. To simulate imperfect TFS representation, the correlation between the TFS in the lead and the lag was varied. Both AM and TFS strongly influenced the precedence effect: 1)No echo thresholds could be obtained for inconsistent delays between TFS and envelope, suggesting that both cues contribute to the PE of ongoing sounds and need to be consistently represented in future CIs. 2)For consistent delays the presence of AM elevated echo thresholds above the unmodulated baseline. This suggests that AM aids the PE potentially through the evaluation of multiple onsets or by serving as a grouping cue. 3)Despite partial TFS decorrelation between lead and lag the presence of AM made it possible to obtain echo thresholds, a potential route to overcome effects of imperfect TFS representation in electric stimulation. Support provided by the Intramural Programme of the MRC.